PCPs Can Help Ease This ‘Public Health Catastrophe’

Recent reports suggest diabetic retinopathy is more common in younger people than previously thought, leading to a call for more frequent screening for this condition and more attention to follow-up after diagnosis.
The increased incidence of diabetic retinopathy is “a potentially unappreciated public health catastrophe,” wrote Julie Rosenthal, MD, MS, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and her coauthors in a recent viewpoint in JAMA Ophthalmology.
Rosenthal, an ophthalmologist, said she has been treating each year several young people with diabetes with symptoms of retinopathy that might have been prevented through earlier detection and treatment.
Some patients with retinopathy seek out eye specialists for issues such as seeing floaters, vision loss, or feeling of having cobwebs in their vision, which can be symptoms of bleeding. Other patients may have no symptoms with their retinopathy discovered only in screening.
“It would be wonderful to never need to treat any 20-year-olds with proliferative diabetic retinopathy who are losing vision,” Rosenthal said.
Diabetic retinopathy once was considered rare in young people, with earlier research suggesting an age-adjusted prevalence of 4%-13% in youths with type 2 diabetes, roughly in line with that for type 1 diabetes.
But an analysis of more recent data drawn from two major federally funded studies of diabetes in young people shows what Rosenthal and her colleagues called “alarming rates” of retinopathy. Data from these studies suggest more than half (52%) of youths with type 1 diabetes may have some retinopathy, and as many as 55% of those with youth-onset type 2 diabetes.
Other research suggests young people with type 2 diabetes may have almost twice the risk of developing retinopathy, develop it sooner after diabetes diagnosis, and are more likely to have vision-threatening retinopathy, Rosenthal and coauthors wrote.
Elizabeth Jensen, PhD, of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, the lead author of a 2023 study cited by Rosenthal and coauthors in their JAMA Ophthalmology viewpoint, told Medscape Medical News she also supports a call for more screening of young people.
“What many people don’t realize is that there is evidence of retinal changes consistent with development of diabetic retinopathy early in disease,” Jensen said.
The proportion of people with diabetic retinopathy varied according to a range of modifiable factors, including A1c levels and blood pressure, she added.
This fact underscores the need to not only screen for diabetic retinopathy early but also consider addressing those modifiable factors that may mitigate risk for the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy, Jensen said.
Rosenthal said some patients have the false impression of sight loss being inevitable with diabetes. Their primary care physicians can help make them aware that there are treatments for retinopathy in cases where it can’t be avoided.
These interventions include laser treatments and injecting medicines into the eye. “It sounds a lot scarier than it is,” Rosenthal said.
“We do know that keeping good control over not only glucose but also blood pressure, cholesterol, and lipids is all important for decreasing the risk. But even if those are under control, sometimes people can still get diabetes in their eyes,” Rosenthal said. “The longer you have diabetes, the higher your risk of having problems in your eye.”
‘Stagnant Guidelines’
Guidelines from major medical groups have “remained largely stagnant in the face of new evidence of increasing diabetes prevalence,” making it difficult to know when to screen younger people, according to Rosenthal and her colleagues.
Medical associations, including the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology, now recommend ocular screening for youths with type 1 diabetes 3-5 years after diagnosis in those who are at least 11 years old or are experiencing puberty, and for youths with type 2 diabetes from the time of diagnosis.
Follow-up diabetic eye examinations can be performed every 2 years, with some groups advocating for even more infrequent follow-up examinations.
“These guidelines are rooted in evidence from prior studies showing that it is rare to have advanced retinopathy prior to this age,” Rosenthal and coauthors wrote. “However, these guidelines have remained largely stagnant in the face of new evidence of increasing diabetes prevalence.”
The American Academy of Ophthalmology told Medscape Medical News it has no immediate plans to update its recommendations. These include directing people with type 1 diabetes without known diabetic retinopathy to have annual dilated eye examinations beginning 5 years after the onset of diabetes. Individuals with type 2 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy should have annual dilated eye examinations to detect the onset of diabetic retinopathy.
The group also said clinicians should make sure patients understand that even if they may have good vision and no ocular symptoms, they may still have significant disease that needs treatment.
More Opportunities for Screening Tools
The current standards of care for retinopathy from the ADA note new products on the market are increasing the options for screening.
“Retinal photography with remote reading by experts has great potential to provide screening services in areas where qualified eye care professionals are not readily available,” according to standards.
“However, the benefits and optimal utilization of this type of screening have yet to be fully determined,” the group stated. “Results of all screening eye examinations should be documented and transmitted to the referring healthcare professionals.”
The approach has promise, despite some significant challenges, according to Rithwick Rajagopal, MD, PhD, an associate professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Rajagopal and colleagues in 2022 published results of a test of retinopathy screening during appointments at the primary care medicine clinic of Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri. They found the system used worked well in ruling out retinopathy and appeared to help more patients receive care for the condition. Among patients referred for follow-up eye exams, the adherence rate was 55.4% at 1-year compared with the historical adherence rate of 18.7%, Rajagopal and his colleagues reported.
In an email exchange with Medscape Medical News, Rajagopal highlighted several barriers to wider adoption of retinopathy screenings in primary care.
“First is unfamiliarity with eye anatomy and physiology, which is associated with low level of comfort in capturing the photographs and interpreting the results (even though the cameras are increasingly easy to use and that the AI software generates the diagnosis),” Rajagopal said.
In addition, questions about reimbursement and liability remain unresolved.
But Rajagopal said he still expects more use of products such as the EyeArt 2.0 automated DR screening software (Eyenuk, Inc.).
“Despite the above concerns, point-of-care screening offers a powerful solution to a long-standing problem: People with diabetes in this country are generally not adherent to recommended retinal screening guidelines,” Rajagopal told Medscape Medical News. “There are multiple causes of such poor adherence, but point-of-care screening solves several of them: No need to take time off for an additional medical visit, no additional co-pay for eye doctor visits, and no need for dilation in many cases.”
Aiding in the adoption of this service is likely the special Current Procedural Terminology (billing) code — 92229 — the American Medical Association introduced in 2021 for diabetic eye exams when ordered by a physician who is not an ophthalmologist. Many commercial health plans and many state Medicaid programs now cover this service, which is still off-label, Michael Abramoff, MD, PhD, of the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, and founder of Digital Diagnostics, maker of the AI-assisted LumineticsCore diagnostic system, told Medscape Medical News. A representative for Eyenuk also told Medscape Medical News many insurers now cover the screening service.
LumineticsCore has been used in a study done in conjunction with appointments for regular care at the Johns Hopkins Pediatric Diabetes Center in Baltimore.
Abramoff and coauthors, including Risa Wolf, MD, a pediatric endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, reported this year in Nature Communications that 100% of patients in the group offered the autonomous AI screening completed their eye exam that day, while only 22% of a comparison group followed through within 6 months to complete an eye exam with an optometrist or ophthalmologist.
Wolf, who is also a coauthor with Rosenthal of the commentary in JAMA Ophthalmology, said she agrees these tools have the potential to expand the pool of clinicians who can screen patients for retinopathy.
Make Screening Easier
The critical issue is to make it easier for young adults with diabetes to get checked for retinopathy, Wolf said. People in their late teens and early 20s face many challenges in getting needed medical screenings. They often are shifting away from living with parents, who likely managed their care for them in their childhood.
These young adults tend to be busy with college and the demands of starting out in careers while living on their own. And they may not want to address the potential consequences of diabetes, which can seem remote to people not feeling effects of the illness.
“It’s just not always a priority, especially when you’re in this time of life where you’re generally feeling very healthy,” Wolf said. “But we want to make sure that they are getting screened.”
Rosenthal reported receiving research grant support from MediBeacon, Inc., outside the submitted work. Other coauthors reported receiving grants from Breakthrough T1D, Physical Sciences, Inc., Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and receiving nonfinancial support from Optovue, Inc., Boston Micromachines, Novo Nordisk, Adaptive Sensory Technology, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, and Alcon outside the submitted work. Jensen reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Eyenuk, Inc. provided the camera and automated screening software used in the study reported by Rajagopal and coauthors and was involved in the data collection and management, but otherwise had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Rajagopal had no personal financial disclosures.
Kerry Dooley Young is a freelance journalist based in Washington, DC. Follow her on LinkedIn and Threads.
 
Send comments and news tips to [email protected].